Movie Recommendations During the Covid Lockdown Part #3

13 Assassins is a 1963 jidaigeki (period drama) film directed by Eiichi Kudo. I have seen Takeshi Miike’s blood soaked remake (2010) and have always been curious about the original. The story is simple – a band of 13 samurais plan to assassinate a cruel feudal lord. Interestingly, if memory serves me well, Miike was very faithful to the original, sometimes reproducing the same shot. I always like these numbered underdogs against an infinite number of scumbags movies. You know not all will survive, but you know they will die well. The first 3/4 is a lot of talk and recruiting, the last half hour is a helluva fight to the end and it is so well-staged I see the crimson red even though it’s shot in B&W. The catharsis hits the spot. Go see Miike’s remake, then check this gem out and you will realise Miike’s version is just a gimmicky and garish film.

Tokyo Drifter is a 1966 yakuza film directed by Seijun Suzuki. The story follows Tetsuya Watari as the reformed yakuza hitman “Phoenix” Tetsu who is forced to roam Japan avoiding execution by rival gangs. The majority of the film takes place in Tokyo, but portrays the city in a highly stylized manner. The opening sequence consists of a mash of images from metropolitan Tokyo, meant to condense the feeling of the city into one sequence. The film opens in stylized black and white, which becomes vibrant color in all subsequent scenes which served to represent Tokyo after the 1964 Summer Olympics. This is my first time discovering Seijun Suzuki and it wouldn’t be my last. Tokyo Drifter is an exercise of style over substance. What style this has! The loyal and charismatic henchman saunters around humming his drifter tune before whacking all the bad guys. Love his cool light blue suit that never gets one single drop of blood stain. This guy is so cool, women want to have his babies, but he pushes them away because a drifter shouldn’t have a girl next to him. It would sully his cool look. Narratively, this lacks structure but there is just enough to keep you on the road to one of the most bombastic climatic gunfights ever. I thought I have seen everything… heck! I am an amateur! I am cueing up his masterpiece Branded to Kill soon. 

Onibaba is a 1964 historical drama horror film written and directed by Kaneto Shindo. The film is set during a civil war in the fourteenth century. Nobuko Otowa and Jitsuko Yoshimura play two women who kill soldiers to steal their possessions, and Kei Satō plays the man who ultimately comes between them. This is my second time and my wife’s first time, a haunting and astonishing film. It feels like a parable, a horror story, a cautionary tale about possessiveness. Erotically charged, bursting with symbolisms, this feels like a critique on consumerism, the destructive nature of sexual desire, all caught in a sea of weaving reeds. The horror element only comes late in the movie, but by then I was already a goner. This is a must-see.

Ran is a 1985 epic action drama film directed, edited and co-written by Akira Kurosawa. The plot derives from William Shakespeare’s King Lear and includes segments based on legends of the daimyō Mōri Motonari. The film stars Tatsuya Nakadai as Hidetora Ichimonji, an aging Sengoku-period warlord who decides to abdicate as ruler in favor of his three sons. This is one of the best 50 films to grace the planet and if you don’t think so you know sh*t. I think it’s my third time seeing it and my wife’s first. This is a film that Kurosawa could never have made when he was younger. It is is a representation of the twilight of his illustrious career and his life. The culmination of all his life’s philosophies and experiences exploded on the screen in vivid colours. It’s the apocalypse of humanity in a kaleidoscope of primary colours. Lots of directors use colours as symbolisms, it is a matter of taste whether the gimmick calls attention to itself. Here, it is incredibly used, both thematically and structurally. You see the humongous battle scenes but you will never be confused who is who. My wife caught a detail I never saw even in my third time – the flags had lines, the number of lines symbolises which brother’s army it is. Ran is epic, full of metaphors (all great movies have that) and grand themes portrayed in grandiose ways. Everything is so operatic and opulent, making you think before you feel. There are no close-ups, everything is divided down the middle. It has an effect on you, making you see everything like an omnipresent God, never lifting a finger to intervene, preferring to lay back and see humans kill humans. You wouldn’t be able to sum up the whole film in a few throwaway lines. It’s one of those few films that teaches you something about life each time you see it.

The Bad Sleep Well is a 1960 movie directed by Akira Kurosawa. It was the first film to be produced under Kurosawa’s own independent production company. The film stars Toshiro Mifune as a young man who gets a prominent position in a corrupt postwar Japanese company in order to expose the men responsible for his father’s death. It has its roots in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, while also doubling as a critique of corporate corruption. Along with Stray Dog (1949) and High and Low (1963), it is one of three films in which Kurosawa explores the film noir genre. This one has its moments but overall it suffers from pacing problems and it is too long. The moment a reveal is dropped it slows down to a crawl when it should have gone up a notch. The ending withholds information that would have garnered sympathy for the hero. Instead, we are given the information through a verbose explanation that provides zero catharsis. It left a bad taste in my mouth. Where Kurosawa did stupendously well is his portrayal of the insidious nature of dirty corporation that leaves bodies in its wake as they lined their pockets with millions. 

Godzilla is a 1954 Japanese kaiju film directed by Ishirō Honda, with special effects by Eiji Tsuburaya. Produced and distributed by Toho Studios, it is the first film in the Godzilla franchise and the Shōwa era. In the film, Japan’s authorities deal with the sudden appearance of a giant monster, whose attacks trigger fears of nuclear holocaust during post-war Japan. The film spawned a multimedia franchise, being recognized by Guinness World Records as the longest running film franchise in history. The character Godzilla has since became an international pop culture icon, and the 1954 film has been largely credited for establishing the template for tokusatsu media. Wow! Just fricking wow! Forget all the Hollywood Godzilla crap! This is where it all began. Going into this film, I was getting ready to be wrapped up by high camp and low cheesiness, but I had no idea I was in for such a superb time. In true monster movie fashion, the Japanese studios never throw in the iconic monster from the get-go. We get the after-effects when the shores of an island became its playground. Humans talk about it in all manners of seriousness. Then we get a roar, a thump and a rearing of a head, and the humans go ape-shite and likewise with us. The movie has the perfect balance between the human and monster elements. Heck! The Hollywood movies can never get this right. When Godzilla goes rampaging into Tokyo I became a small wide-eyed boy again. It’s not just a guilty pleasure, the film is filled with metaphors and symbolisms. They even put in one for Oppenheimer, the scientist who created the atomic bomb, and his profound sadness in seeing his invention gets used for destruction. His ultimate sacrifice is well-handled and hits a spot for me. And get this…. I actually felt for the poor thing that was Godzilla who could inspire terror and garner sympathy. 

Good Morning is a 1959 comedy film by Japanese director Yasujirō Ozu. It is a loose remake of his own 1932 silent film I Was Born, But…, and is Ozu’s second film in color. I have seen most of Ozu’s celebrated films and this is the first time I laughed out loud. The story is so simple – two young boys in suburban Tokyo take a vow of silence after their parents refuse to buy them a television set. All of Ozu’s films are shot from the perspective of adults, but this one is from the petulant boys’ point of view. It is an enchanting portrayal of family life but using this deceptively simple framework Ozu gives a sharp critique towards the gossiping nature of Japanese folks, meaningless rituals and consumerism.

Branded to Kill is a 1967 Japanese yakuza film directed by Seijun Suzuki and starring Joe Shishido, Koji Nanbara and Annu Mari. The story follows Goro Hanada in his life as a contract killer. He falls in love with a woman named Misako, who recruits him for a seemingly impossible mission. When the mission fails, he becomes hunted by the phantom Number One Killer, whose methods threaten his sanity as much as his life.

The studio was unhappy with the original script and called in Suzuki to rewrite and direct it at the last minute. Suzuki came up with many of his ideas the night before or on the set while filming, and welcomed ideas from his collaborators. He gave the film a satirical, anarchic and visually eclectic bent which the studio had previously warned him away from. It was a commercial and critical disappointment and Suzuki was ostensibly fired for making “movies that make no sense and no money”. Suzuki successfully sued Nikkatsu with support from student groups, like-minded filmmakers and the general public and caused a major controversy through the Japanese film industry. Suzuki was blacklisted and did not make another feature film for 10 years but became a counterculture hero.

The film grew a strong following, which expanded overseas in the 1980s, and has established itself as a cult classic. Film critics and enthusiasts now regard it as an absurdist masterpiece. It has been cited as an influence by filmmakers such as Jim Jarmusch, John Woo, Chan-wook Park and Quentin Tarantino, and composer John Zorn.

I lifted all the above words from wiki. It is important to know that information while watching this crazy movie to understand the nonsense the movie throws at you. Actually, “nonsense” is probably not a good word to describe it. It’s bravura gonzo filmmaking. Suzuki dreams up crazy scenarios and just shoots it exactly how his fevered brain imagined it. The editing goes through starts and stops with no regard to continuity but you will have no trouble following the general story. It’s about a hitman hall-of-fame chart that only has 3 entries. I think nobody cares about the chart except for the three dudes. Oh… there are lots of nudity and some full-frontals by a nubile girl and another stunner whose dream and aspiration is to die. I think she did not receive the memo that everybody dies eventually. There are some inventive shootouts (even crazier than Tokyo Drifter) and the last half hour is one helluva absurdist wet dream. I love this shite. We laughed at so many crazy moments (stuff I have never seen before) and it’s instantly memorable.

The Sword of Doom is a 1966 jidaigeki film directed by Kihachi Okamoto and stars Tatsuya Nakadai. It was based on the serial novel of the same title by Kaizan Nakazato. This film boasts some of the most impressive swordplay of samurai epics. Visceral and violent, yet gorgeously choreographed to the tempo of exquisite death. 

Ever wonder what happens if the most immoral person becomes a politician or a psychopath becomes a police officer (wait a minute… there are examples of this in real life!) or a sociopath becomes a samurai? Phew… the last example has not happened in reality. I love how Tatsuya Nakadai plays his character Ryunosuke with a sickening smile as he dispatched the umpteenth samurai. He literally looks like he gets off on it. At one point the wife of his opponent begs Ryunosuke to throw the match, offering her own virtue in trade. Ryunosuke accepts her offer, but still kills her husband in the match. This guy is looking to get the Scumbag of the Century award. The fella just goes around amassing vendettas like nobody’s business but he finally meets his match in Toshiro Mifune’s Shimada, a sword master. The climax is already deliriously teased out because Shimada is coaching a samurai on the technique to slay Ryunosuke to exact revenge for killing his brother and destroying his family. Oh man… I was rubbing my hands in glee with the prospect of a bloody finale. But in an extremely odd choice of narrative cop-outs, we do not get to see that climax. The movie literally ends with a freeze like a slap on my face, an unnecessary subplot diversion notwithstanding. It almost feels like since Ryunosuke is such a scumbag that nobody cares about him and the director decided that since nobody bothered to know his fate he didn’t care to. From 5 stars, this became a 3 star movie in a split second. 

Daniel Chiam

European Movies and TV Series For Covid Lockdown

Since we had a Japanese-themed movie marathon, I thought it may be a great idea to have a European one. Initially, I really wanted to squeeze as many great movies from Europe as possible, but finally we just took it easy. Wifey made pizzas to go with them… perfect.

Nights of Cabiria is a 1957 Italian drama film directed by Federico Fellini and starring Giulietta Masina, François Périer, and Amedeo Nazzari. Based on a story by Fellini, the film is about a prostitute in Rome who searches in vain for true love. Besides the best actress award at the Cannes Film Festival for Giulietta Masina, Nights of Cabiria won the 1957 Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. This was the second straight year Italy and Fellini won this Academy Award, having won for 1956’s La Strada, which also starred Giulietta Masina. I love this to bits because of Giulietta Masina’s incredibly naked performance. Yes, she is a prostitute, she lives on the fringes of society, but so what? I love how Masina plays her – a plucky and spunky girl that grabs life by the balls. She is Chaplin and Keaton all rolled into a waif of a girl with aspirations for life. Who says a hooker don’t deserve happiness? Her fallback basic instinct is to search for truth in lies and happiness in sadness. In her you will see a blueprint for living your life – she knows she is a loser, but the difference is she doesn’t want to be one forever. The last scene is heart-achingly beautiful – a teardrop laced with mascara congealed on one eye and the scene plays with perfect juxtaposition and emphatic contrast to the scene of jubilant celebration all around her. Is it a cruel joke, is it her doing a mental system reset? Cabiria conveys a resolute notion that you don’t have to worry about her. I know it’s just a movie, but each time it ends I always say a silent prayer she will eventually find true love. She deserves it. All my life I have met many women, sometimes I find instances of Cabiria in some of them, but there wasn’t any who comes close to a living embodiment of Cabiria (I have a friend who for the longest time was searching for Faye Wong’s character in Chungking Express. I say this because I need to let you know I am not crazy). Forget Julia Roberts in Pretty Woman, Nights of Cabiria is the best film about a prostitute with a heart of gold.

The Conformist is a 1970 political drama film directed by Bernardo Bertolucci, whose screenplay is based on the 1951 novel The Conformist by Alberto Moravia. Bertolucci makes use of the 1930s art and decor associated with the Fascist era: the middle-class drawing rooms and the huge halls of the ruling elite. The film is a case study in the psychology of conformism and fascism: Marcello Clerici is a bureaucrat, cultivated and intellectual but largely dehumanized by an intense need to be ‘normal’ and to belong to whatever is the current dominant socio-political group. He grew up in an upper class, perhaps dysfunctional family, and he suffered a major childhood sexual trauma and gun violence episode in which he long believed that he had killed his chauffeur. More than anything, it is Bertolucci‘s style that engaged me. It’s poetic, rich and so baroque. It plays with light and shadows to sublime effect. There is a scene near the end that happens in the woods – a woman screams and runs through the trees, sunlight streamed down through the canopy, shots ring out, faceless men in trench coats shooting at her. It is a stunning scene – a scene of violence in a sea of nature. 

The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie is a 1972 surrealist film directed by Luis Buñuel and written by Jean-Claude Carrière in collaboration with the director. The film was made in France and is mainly in French, with some dialogue in Spanish. The narrative concerns a group of upper middle class people attempting—despite continual interruptions—to dine together. The film received the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film and a nomination for Best Original Screenplay. Most people I know who have seen this tend to summarise it as a movie about six people who never got a chance to have their meal. That’s a little too trite – it’s like saying Field of Dreams is about baseball and Star Wars is about good versus evil in space. This is my third time and I still managed to catch some gags I have missed previously. There is no plot, only situations, but what situations they are – the three ladies ordered tea but there isn’t any, they switched to coffee but soon the waiter tells them they have run out of water. Another – they were invited to dinner, they sat down, then curtains were drawn and they realised they are participants in a play and the audience are shouting their disapproval. It’s subversive, it’s outlandish, and so many years later it still works like a charm.

Russian Ark is a 2002 experimental historical drama film directed by Alexander Sokurov. In Russian Ark, an unnamed narrator wanders through the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg, and implies that he died in some horrible accident and is a ghost drifting through the palace. In each room, he encounters various real and fictional people from various periods in the city’s 300-year history. He is accompanied by “the European”, who represents the Marquis de Custine, a 19th-century French traveler. The film was recorded entirely in the Winter Palace of the Russian State Hermitage Museum on 23 December 2001 using a one-take single 96-minute Steadicam sequence shot. Russian Ark uses the fourth wall device extensively, but repeatedly broken and re-erected. At times the narrator and the companion interact with the other performers, whilst at other times they pass unnoticed. Forget Birdman and the recent 1917, this is the granddaddy of the one-take movie. This is a cinematic tour de force through 300 years of Russian history, filmed with a cast of thousands, three live orchestras and an army of technicians who all hit their marks at the precise timing. If you want to learn Russian history, immersed yourself with this.

Rome, Open City is a 1945 Italian neorealist drama film directed by Roberto Rossellini. The picture features Aldo Fabrizi, Anna Magnani and Marcello Pagliero, and is set in Rome during the Nazi occupation in 1944. The title refers to Rome being declared an open city after 14 August 1943. The film won several awards at various film festivals, including the most prestigious Cannes Grand Prix and was nominated for the Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar at the 19th Academy Awards. Rome, 1944. Giorgio Manfredi, one of the leaders of the Resistance, is tracked down by the Nazis. He goes to his friend Francesco’s, and asks Pina, Francesco’s fiancée, for help. Pina must warn a priest, Don Pietro Pellegrini, that Giorgio needs to leave the town as soon as possible … Shot near the end of the liberation of Rome, this is the pioneering film of Italian neorealism. It is a very accomplished war drama film made during a dangerous time. There is little embellishment. It is a film about the essence of tragedy and the facts speak for themselves without a needless romanticised tale. Chances are you may not have seen this but an image of a woman running after her husband-to-be captured by the Nazis and getting mowed down in a hail of bullets will befuddle you – where have I seen that? That’s one of the iconic shots. 

Then we put this Ingrid Bergman’s TV series on and 5 amazing hours went by…

Scenes from a Marriage is a 1973 Swedish Television miniseries written and directed by Ingmar Bergman and starring Liv Ullmann and Erland Josephson. The story explores the disintegration of the marriage between Marianne, a family lawyer specializing in divorce, and Johan, spanning a period of 10 years. Bergman’s teleplay draws on his own experiences, including his relationship with Ullmann. After initially airing on Swedish TV in six parts, the miniseries was condensed into a theatrical version and received positive reviews in Sweden and internationally. Scenes from a Marriage was also the subject of controversy for its perceived influence on rising divorce rates in Europe.

Initially, I thought I would have to break up the series for a watch, but I sat through 5 hours in one sitting, bearing witness to some of the best acting I have ever seen. When it ended, we were emotionally exhausted, our hearts and souls had gone on a wild rollercoaster ride. I can’t help comparing this to The World of the Married, which is no doubt entertaining, but it’s completely artless. Twists and turns are announced with heightened music cues and close-ups. Scenes From a Marriage also chronicles the death of a marriage albeit in less spectacular ways, but no less absorbing and in a more truthful way. Bergman is never interested in happy families because they are happy in the usual ways; the auteur is interested in unhappy families because they are unhappy in unique ways. This is one of the most honest and truthful portrayal of a marriage. Oh man… on the surface they are the epitome of a happy married couple, but underneath the surface is repressed feelings and desires. This is one intense character study and is not something you can watch while munching on chips and sipping beer; this one will make you look inward and ponder if you did the right thing in marrying the person sitting next to you. I want to say a lot more but my words are utter crap and I know crap about marriage as it turns out. One last thing… being a film-buff I love creating movie lists like “best action scenes”, “best ending scenes”, “best lines” and “best sex scenes” (don’t worry, I am not a pervert 😬) and in this last category I have sub-categories like “most sleazy sex scene”, “most heartwarming sex scene” and something called “saddest sex scene”. The one that almost happened in ep3, it is the episode Johan basically drops the bomb that he is going to leave her for Paula, has deposed the one that I adored in The Wings of the Dove (1997). It was utterly heartbreaking to see Marianne plead with Johan to make love to her one last time. My heart broke into a million smithereens.

That’s it for our European weekend. Originally, I wanted to see three more since the next day was a holiday, but I am quite attuned to my wife’s disposition with these arthouse films. I have to comment that she kept her enthusiasm as high as she could and that’s a mean feat. I shan’t “torture” her anymore. I will do the rest on my own. 

Written by Daniel Chiam

More Movie Recommendations on Lockdown Part #4

There are seriously no movies screening at the cinemas worth braving the pandemic for. If I am going to be stuck in my seat in a cinema hall with a virus carrier for two hours, it better be a great one, so it’s back to watching movies at home…

Five Feet Apart is another teenage critical disease of the week weepie in the vein of The Fault in Our Stars. It is mawkish and rides the tropes like a rodeo king, and it doesn’t reach the heights of TFiOS, but I am giving it a free pass because the leads deal with all the emotional trappings with gusto and most importantly it serves as a good reminder that all of us should count our blessings. 

Seventeen-year-old Stella (Haley Lu Richardson) spends most of her time in the hospital as a cystic fibrosis patient. Her life is full of routines, boundaries and self-control all of which get put to the test when she meets Will (Cole Sprouse), an impossibly charming teen who has the same illness. There’s an instant flirtation, through restrictions dictate that they must maintain a safe distance between them. As their connection intensifies, so does the temptation to throw the rules out the window and embrace that attraction.

What is the first thing you want to do when you fall in love? I am giving you a few seconds to think about this… nope, it isn’t that… wipe that silly grin off your face 😊… it’s a touch, a human touch. “Human touch. Our first form of communication. Safety, security, comfort, all in the gentle caress of a finger. Or the brush of lips on a soft cheek. It connects us when we’re happy, bolsters us in times of fear, excites us in times of passion and love. We need that touch from the one we love, almost as much as we need air to breathe.” 

Breathing is hard for these CF patients. A touch is impossible. A kiss, don’t even think about that. The things all of us probably take for granted. 

I love seeing how they struggle to make sense of their love in this cruel scheme of things, and I can appreciate why they want to take the bull by the horns by risking that one little foot. It’s their little victory in this game called life. 

Sting once sang “if you love someone set them free”. That’s not BS. I was talking to a colleague the other day about how I broke off with my girlfriend by doing one last loving act for her… nah, I won’t share here, but it was a final act that gave both of us wings to soar again. I think to love is better than to be loved. The last act Will does in the movie is a great one. 

Don’t underestimate the healing power of a touch. So if you’re reading this, and you’re able, touch him. Touch her. Life’s too short to waste a second. 

Glory Road is a 2006 American sports drama film directed by James Gartner, based on a true story surrounding the events leading to the 1966 NCAA University Division Basketball Championship (the historic name for what is now known as the NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament). Don Haskins portrayed by Josh Lucas, head coach of Texas Western College (Now known as University of Texas at El Paso or UTEP), coached a team with an all-black starting lineup, a first in NCAA history. Glory Road explores racism, discrimination, and student athletics. Underdog sports genre films don’t really have to do much to make me go nuts for the characters. To me, these movies spout life lessons. The sport doesn’t matter, the plot doesn’t matter and the ending doesn’t matter. We all know how they will progress and end. It is about the journey and the journey is hard work. I love listening to all the slogans and euphemisms from the coach’s mouth – “You’ll play basketball my way. My way is hard”, “Do you want me to get you a skirt? I’ll get you a skirt if you keep playing like a girl!” and “Your dignity’s inside you. Nobody can take something away from you if you don’t give them”. This is one rousing movie and it ticks all the boxes for an underdog sport genre movie.

Ain’t Them Bodies Saints is a 2013 American romantic crime drama film written and directed by David Lowery. The film stars Casey Affleck as Bob Muldoon, Rooney Mara as Ruth Guthrie and Ben Foster as Patrick Wheeler. Bob (Affleck) and Ruth (Mara) are a couple who become involved in criminal activities and are caught, with Bob taking the blame and going to prison. The film follows the events after the criminal activities as Ruth gives birth to their daughter, and the two live comfortably. When the child is nearly four, Bob escapes from jail and goes looking to reconnect with his family. The story is a dime in a dozen, but the execution isn’t, giving the Bonnie and Clyde archetype a fresh coat of paint. The cinematography is gorgeous and the editing artful. The movie has a rhythm and tempo that is so beguiling. The love portrayed is palpable. No need to say too much… The love between them is so real you will feel it in a voiceless scene when you are led away by the police. They know it is the last time they can touch each other and this is the scene that is featured in the movie poster. While watching this my mind threw up another movie that also has a rhythm and tempo of its own so I decided we should try this next…

The Tree of Life is a 2011 American experimental epic drama film written and directed by Terrence Malick. The film chronicles the origins and meaning of life by way of a middle-aged man’s childhood memories of his family living in 1950s Texas, interspersed with imagery of the origins of the known universe and the inception of life on Earth. This was the second time I saw it. The first time completely befuddled me and I had a feeling it turned my hair white. This is one of those Emperor’s New Clothes type of movie. Critics love to love it, but the layman will go WTF is this shite. I confess that I hated it the first time, but the second time round I began to appreciate it a lot better and 3h 10min whizzed by. Mallick didn’t tell a conventional story with a spine, he goes to the spaces between pronounced instances in one’s life. The movie goes through a tumult of emotions representing almost every feeling you will possess while growing up – love, envy, jealousy, compassion…. the list goes on. It is almost a masterpiece because I didn’t think that creation of Earth and Sean Penn’s sequences gelled with the main story. If I do watch another time it will years later and I will listen to the commentary.

McQueen is a 2018 biographical documentary based on the life and career of British fashion designer Alexander McQueen. It does a very compelling and comprehensive job of detailing McQueen’s rags to riches story. His talent is undeniable. He may not have much of a formal education but given a thread and a needle he can weave a tapestry like the Sistine Chapel. Like a lot of stories about celebrities, this is also about a tortured genius going through a tumult of emotions. Who is it to say we didn’t have a hand in “killing” him because we feed on his talents. The whole thing works like a visual album of a genius’ creations and the amount of pressure he was under and OMG the man can really put on a spectacular show. I find all these catwalk shows superficial, but when I saw the clothes he designed and the show he put on I was so impressed. What a sad way to leave.

United 93 is a 2006 biographical drama-thriller film written, co-produced and directed by Paul Greengrass, that chronicles events aboard United Airlines Flight 93, which was hijacked during the September 11 attacks of 2001. The film attempts to recount the hijacking and subsequent events in the flight with as much veracity as possible (there is a disclaimer that some imagination had to be used) and in real time (from the flight’s takeoff). The passengers’ response to the hijacking has come to be invested with great moral significance. The DVD was sitting on my shelf since God knows when and I was glad to take it down for a watch. What a tremendous experience – it’s an event I don’t want to relive and never want to forget. The film honours the victims in a respectable way. It’s the type of movie you know going in you already know the outcome, but the tension still builds and builds to a point you somehow wish it had never happened. Like the COVID-19 pandemic, the 9/11 terrorist attack reset the world – it’s the type of world event that essentially demarcates the timeline of the world into two sections. It is a good choice to use unrecognisable actors for the movie. It really thrusts you into United 93 on the way to the White House. It’s tense, brutal and honest, with little embellishments. 

Shane is a 1953 American Technicolor Western film from Paramount Pictures, noted for its landscape cinematography, editing, performances, and contributions to the genre. The picture was produced and directed by George Stevens from a screenplay by A. B. Guthrie Jr., based on the 1949 novel of the same name by Jack Schaefer. Its Oscar-winning cinematography was by Loyal Griggs. Shane stars Alan Ladd and Jean Arthur in the last feature (and only color) film of her career. This lockdown I intend to watch all the westerns I have in my possession, this is probably one of the last few. Should have saved this for the last because it is a superb film. It’s about a weary gunfighter who attempts to settle down with a homestead family, but a smoldering settler/rancher conflict forces him to act. This one has a mythical sheen gleaming in every scene. It feels effortlessly timeless, an olden time cemented in your consciousness. Times may have changed, but people are still feeling oppressed in many parts of the world. The intimate storytelling has a stalwart integrity and it also has the ability to say a lot more without having to tell you a lot. One of those rare films I would gladly revisit.

Kiss Me Deadly is 1955 American film noir produced and directed by Robert Aldrich. The film follows a private investigator in Los Angeles who becomes embroiled in a complex mystery after picking up a female hitchhiker who has escaped from a psychiatric hospital. I have seen many mashups of genres, but I believe this is the first time I see a mashup of noir and apocalyptic sci-fi. It dials into the Cold War paranoia palpably and it features one of the coolest opening credit sequences of all time. I won’t share what it is. Remember the mysterious briefcase in Pulp Fiction? Tarantino definitely lifted the idea from here. Remember the climatic scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark when the ark was opened? Spielberg definitely paid homage to Kiss Me Deadly. Really enjoyed this tremendously. It played with so many noir conventions to great effect.

House of Games is a 1987 American neo-noir heist-thriller film directed by David Mamet, his directorial debut. He also wrote the screenplay, based on a story he co-wrote with Jonathan Katz. This one is about the world of the con man and a fascinating character study of a psychiatrist. That’s it… don’t find out more about the plot. Nothing is going to beat the first time you see this. What I can tell you is that this felt like getting lost in a labyrinth and getting your brains f*cked in the nicest of ways. The beauty of it is that you wouldn’t think you are lost in a maze until the end of the movie and you suddenly realised you have been conned. Hollywood doesn’t make these types of movies anymore. Everything out of there is mostly based on a template, going through the motions, nothing is original anymore. With David Mamet, you know his every word, comma, ellipse carries humongous weight and he writes killer dialogue. The gradual unfolding of the plot is sheer masterclass. This DVD sat on my shelf forever ago and I remember buying it for only one reason – David Mamet. Watch this…. please. I end with Roger Ebert’s words: “This movie is awake. I have seen so many films that were sleepwalking through the debris of old plots and second-hand ideas that it was a constant pleasure to watch House of Games.”

Written by Daniel Chiam

My Neighbour Totoro (1988). Enchantment at its Purest Form

Ponyo on the Cliff by the Sea, Spirited Away, Kiki’s Delivery Service… I am sure everyone has their favourite and this is mine…

My Neighbour Totoro has become one of the most beloved family films of all time. Interestingly, the first time I saw it wasn’t in its original opening year of 1988. At that time I was still in the army and all things masculine. What I presumed was a cheesy anime of an outlandish grey creature didn’t entice me one bit. The first time I saw the anime was from a Studio Ghibli DVD boxset a few years later, but I distinctively recalled that it didn’t floor me. It was in 1998, one rainy night in my university, during a screening in a theatre, I finally ‘got’ it. When the lights came on, I could see tears and smiles on a lot of my classmates’ faces.

What did I ‘get’ that night? I finally understood why it’s revered as a masterpiece for a cartoon. It didn’t use the traditional narrative structure and the usual plot devices to tell its story. This film has NO villains. NO fight scenes. NO angry disbelieving parents. NO suspicious characters with ulterior motives. NO red herrings. NO plot twists and turns. NO fighting between the two sisters (in fact during the first hour both sisters’ moods and attitudes are similar. If it’s Hollywood their behavior will be the opposite, acting as counterpoints). NO scary monsters. NO lesson learned arcs for main characters. On paper it looks like a disaster because the ingredients for a story are just not there. But oh man… the film works so well. If you can’t marvel at it, it is because of one of three reasons – you are immature, you have a heart of stone or you have just broken up with someone.

The film does not work on the premise of threats or conflicts but on situations. It is suffused with the joy of country living (no long faces here, complaining of boredom). It unites the unique vision of Miyazaki with a feel-good tale of childlike wonder, true originality and pure enchantment. You will find nothing emotionally manipulative here.

Since that evening at the university, I have seen it at least five more times and every time I would still notice stuff that I have missed in my last viewing. Last night I saw an early scene where Satsuki first lay eyes on their new rundown house and shook on a wooden pillar. Debris falls, she laughs heartily. Mei follows her sis and does the same, debris falls more violently. Everybody, including their dad laughs. If this is any other movie, a foreshadowing doom music will ring out, dad’s face contorted in mortal danger and to seal the deal, dad will sprout some warning to the kids. I also noticed in this latest viewing that ghosts, goblins and boogeyman are mentioned but the words are uttered in a sense of wonder, not of doom. Try also to name a cartoon with a sick parent/adult (I know… Pixar’s Up)… there are not many and I am going to say the ill adult is used as the focus point to tell the bigger story. In this film, illness is treated as a matter of fact.

I love this movie. It is a film that teaches you how the world should be and how we should live and want to live our life.

My friends for life…

Written by Daniel Chiam

Number 1 (2020), Enjoyable but Forgettable

Number 1 is painted in broad strokes, albeit colourful ones. So this review will similarly be written in broad strokes.

Chow Chee Beng (Mark Lee) was served his retrenchment letter in an inopportune time. He has a new SUV and a landed property that have not been paid for. Desperate for a job, any job, a night club manager (Henry Thia) engages him to be his AGM. Chow thinks he is going to be an Assistant General Manager. It turns out to be a job that entails much more than he bargained for. He needs to manage a group of drag queen performers and AGM stands for Ah Gua Manager. To make matters worse, Chow even has to become a drag queen to replace a member of the troupe.

This may sound like a huge broad stroke, but for me, films made in Singapore usually fall heavily on two ends of the spectrum. It’s either low brow comedies or arty farty stuff. Number 1 is in the former. At times it does show some aspirations to become something else, but alas it feels more comfortable in that category.

I make it sound like I didn’t enjoy it, which couldn’t be far from the truth. While it lasted, I guffawed in raucous laughter as Chow tries so hard to be one with the queens and he is an easy character to get behind. Pulling in a restrained performance, Mark Lee definitely deserves his Best Actor nomination at the upcoming Golden Horse Awards.

Where the movie is most enjoyable is having Chow in the front and centre. Whether he is trying his hardest to tap into his feminine side or getting away in the nick of time when discovered by his family members, he is a delirious joy to watch.

The musical numbers is also another place where it shines, albeit intermittently. With eyelashes that reach for the sky, shimmery dresses that reflect every light from the disco ball and explosive hairdos you would never be caught dead on the streets with, ‘em gals know how to get it on. By ‘intermittent’, I mean some of the musical numbers became repetitive; they literally repeat some of the performances and songs. This really needed to be cooked a little longer with a few more song numbers. But I have to say watching Chow launch into Anita Mui’s 女人花 and a Hokkien version of Gloria Gaynor’s I Will Survive does wash away some of the bad taste on my senses.

Character-wise, this is as thin as a rake. The backstories of the queens are painted in such a way as to elicit pity without sympathy and praise without empathy. The road to their redemption is paved in sincerity with utter familiarity.

Plot-wise, this feels like a made for TV feature with sub-plots that are never conclusive. For instance, the plot of Chow’s dire financial situation never did close on any note and his wife’s eventual acceptance of what Chow did is never drawn with any empathetic closure. Some ideas are dropped for a skit or two and then merely forgotten.

In terms of message, Number 1 isn’t brave enough to go one step further in its fight against homophobia and transphobia. At times it is too obvious when it should be subtle, a case in point would be the main character’s name, Chow Chee Beng. Any true blue Singaporean would get that. Number 1 doesn’t believe in being subt; being crass is the only way it knows how. Perhaps, it’s just there to plant the seeds of love for all kinds, but whether it would germinate is another story.

Written by Daniel Chiam

Review: Parasite (2019). A Biting Social Satire

Social satires are tricky business. Their primary job is to skewer deeply seated social stigmas, but rarely are they funny. Most directors know only one way to get the message across: ram the idea into your head. It takes an informed storyteller to milk it differently. The gold standard of any satire is the ability to turn the camera inwards at the audience making them aware they have been essentially laughing at themselves for two hours. Bong Joon-ho’s Palme d’Or winner Parasite ticks all the boxes and it is a biting social satire of lurid lengths and vivid highs.

The Kims live in a dinghy sub-basement dwelling and work odd jobs to make ends meet. Then Ki-woo (Choi Woo-sik), the eldest son, is asked to fake his credentials to take over his friend’s job as a tuition teacher. His student Da-hye (Jung Ji-so) is the daughter of a wealthy man, Mr Park (Lee Sun-kyun). Soon, Ki-woo manages to hoodwink Mrs Park (Jo Yeo-jeong) into employing his sister Ki-jung (Park So-dam) as a child psychologist for Mrs Park’s hyperactive young son. Before long, the father Ki-taek (Song Kang-ho) and mother Choong-sook (Jang Hye-jin) also come under the employ of the Parks without the Parks realising that they are all related. All this will set in motion a series of events that will change the fortunes of both families.

This is a return to form for Bong after his dalliance with Hollywood (Snowpiercer and Okja) which didn’t yield great results in my opinion. His Korean outputs fare far better. Bong’s movies defy easy pigeonholing. Saying The Host (2006) is a monster movie is conveniently forgetting it is a tragically funny study of a dysfunctional family and a fierce critique of society’s blatant environmental carelessness. Classifying Memories of Murder (2003) under the mystery tag is sweeping its searing tone of an entire nation’s ineptitude and apathy under the carpet. Parasite pulls off a high-wire act of balancing so many societal elements without diminishing the gravity of the situation.

When the movie opens, the two siblings of the Kim family are trying to access the wifi of their above neighbours who have finally set a password to stop the leech-ers. Yes, there are freeloaders in every sense of the word, but they are our freeloaders. The Kims are lovable grifters, thinking that society owes them one. They feel justified in doing shoddy work even if it’s an odd job like folding pizza boxes. A warped sense of justice and entitlement binds them and they feel they are totally justified to break the rules to survive.

Bong’s first grand feat here is making us laugh at them and in so doing at ourselves. I don’t know about you, but I am pretty sure we all know people like them albeit in a smidgen sort of way. The Kims aren’t portrayed as punching bags to be cut down at will. There is a certain likeable quality they possessed that you wish existed in your family. Just look at how the dad comment on Ki-jung’s photoshop forgery skills and feel the admiration course through the family members’ veins. Before long, you won’t be laughing at them; you will be laughing with them.

The tone is deftly handled throughout the first act and I found myself sinking comfortably into my seat laughing at the absurdity of it all. I thought I have finally figured out the track the movie is taking. Then with a doorbell in the dead of a rainy night, everything changes. I am going to do you a favour by keeping my mouth shut about the plot from this moment on.

Parasite is one wicked bridge linking two ends of the wealth divide. Bong successfully makes us see the issue from both sides and our sympathies continue to waver from end to end. Most directors will make us choose sides and elicit hate. Not here, Bong makes us pity them. He keeps the darkly comic perversities and desperate acts coming at such a brisk pace that you barely realise it has shifted gears.

The cinematography is stunning, bringing forth the stark juxtaposition of the level of both parties’ station. I have a feeling a huge amount of the budget went into the construction of the Parks’ mansion. The minimalistic magnificence is at once cold but arresting. The intruding camera weaves through the labyrinth like it was capturing the skeletal remains of a blue whale.

Everything culminates in a furious climax where you will start to ponder who deserves to live and die. Perhaps the only weak spot is the rushed falling action where Bong ties up all the loose ends in a brisk clip, but it’s a good thing Bong saves one more gut punch right in the end that brings everything to a lyrical closure. It is not quite a hopeful end which would be patronising, but more of a delusional bent on everything.

Bong has crafted a cynical treatise on the moral and ethical decline of a modern Korean society and a cautionary tale of the love for money. Heck! I think it is an exact mirror image of my Singaporean society who also takes no prisoners. These days working hard doesn’t necessarily equate to eventual success anymore. Parasite feels like the middle finger to our current state of affairs.

Written by Daniel Chiam

Review: Pulse (2001). A Horror Story of Urban Dislocation in Tokyo

Last week, my secondary level students were tasked to write an essay on the pros and cons of allowing young children access to the internet. I should have shown them Pulse (2001) because it would have proffered the mother of all disadvantages of allowing kids full access to the internet.

What if there is an evil entity behind the computer screen and it prompts you to click on YES so it can come out to “play” with you. Pulse gives new meaning to the phrase “ghost in the machine.” That’s what I will say about the plot and nothing else.

Like all good ghost stories, writer-director Kiyoshi Kurosawa sets a trap for its protagonist, with a computer that does its own internet dial-up and a website that is haunted. We are drawn to the website like our curious protagonists, which looks like the site of a bloody accident. We know we will have nightmares but our eyes and our entire being are wedded to it and we want the protagonists to click on YES. They will die, but at least they would have seen the infinite void of sheer terror.

Pulse’s has an interesting subtext – what if the internet is not just a gateway to infinite knowledge and the merging of global hamlets, but a doorway to another world filled with lonely ghouls? What if instead of making the world smaller, it actually makes you feel isolated? Kurosawa’s choice of aesthetics and stylistics throughout the film underscores isolation, with characters often espied through wafting curtains and even through the POV of the computer screen. The individuals’ dislocation with reality is made all the more palpable when they are being exploited while relishing in the nascent online community. The sense of dread feels real and the spine-chilling imagery seems to have been extracted from the subconscious of a neurotic nebbish.

Kurosawa gives you just enough information to let you figure out what’s going on and then pulls the carpet from right under your feet by doing a sharp turn and head on into an apocalyptic cine-scape. The theme of the film remains oblique, the characters are vaguely drawn and the narrative lacks clarity, but therein lies its devilish charm – everything and everyone seem to work on dream logic. None of the characters stand out and my guess is that you would not be emotionally tethered to them, but you will be counting the moments they are CTRL-ALT-DEL from the face of the earth. Chances are, you will remember their shocking demise even if you want to forget them. I for one will never forget how the ghouls move and how the victims spout some disturbing melancholia before they are gone.

Pulse could do with some paring down from a 2-hour runtime which causes the middle act to sag, but it definitely belongs in the pantheon of great J-horror films. If The Ring (1998) made me not want to watch TV alone at night; if Ju-on (2002) made me not want to wash my hair, then Pulse made me wary of clicking on YES.

Written by Daniel Chiam

Quick Musings: Nomadland, Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, Sound of Metal, Never Rarely Sometimes Always, Minari, Promising Young Woman

Nomadland (2020) is lauded by almost every critic and seems like a shoo-in for some major nominations. The story goes like this… following the economic collapse of a company town in rural Nevada, Fern (Frances McDormand) packs her van and sets off on the road exploring a life outside of conventional society as a modern-day nomad. The third feature film from director Chloé Zhao, Nomadland features real nomads Linda May, Swankie and Bob Wells as Fern’s mentors and comrades in her exploration through the vast landscape of the American West.

The movie belongs to Frances McDormand and once the film cuts to black you will know in your bones she is born to play the part. It is a quiet performance but a powerful one. I like movies like this because it doesn’t sugarcoat and doesn’t believe in painting everything in golden sunsets. Life is hard, damn fu*king hard but Fern lives her life on her own terms. You will think she is homeless, but she will tell you she’s just houseless. It’s a life by choice, a choice handed out to her by hard circumstances and she gets busy living it. The human endeavour juxtaposes superbly well with the sparse landscape. It is almost like a forgotten wasteland, beautiful once upon a time. This is an extraordinary film but it is in my book a one-time movie. I won’t be able to sit through this again.

Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom (2020) feels like a chamber piece with mainly two settings. It feels like watching an iron cauldron of a play as a blues singer is contracted by white producers to record her Blues music. Black issues and giant egos get the spotlight. Viola Davis and the late Chadwick Boseman should get Oscar nods. Most of us will remember Boseman as Black Panther, but in this film he displays a range that surpasses everything he was in. This will go down as his finest performance.

Sound of Metal (2020) is about a drummer in a heavy metal outfit who loses his sense of hearing and then has to learn to be deaf. Riz Ahmed turned in a career best performance and he is a shoo-in for a Best Actor nomination. The movie is engrossing and it is a shame I couldn’t catch this in the cinema because the sound design is amazing. This one will put you in the head of a person who is slowly becoming deaf and losing everything he holds dear. This is definitely a movie I wouldn’t mind watching again in the cinema. In my book, after the sense of sight, the loss of one’s sense of hearing is the worst.

Never Rarely Sometimes Always (2020) has a simple plot. The story is about two teenage girls going to New York because one of them needs an abortion. The movie is not interested in who, when and how she got pregnant but you will know in your bones the answers to those questions. I appreciate the movie’s honesty and total unsentimentality. Watch out for the scene where the movie title is uttered repeatedly. Your heart will break in that scene. I like how the friendship is depicted – sometimes you just need someone standing with you as you go through life’s most trying trials and tribulations, just standing there with you.

Minari (2020) is an immigrant story, which means it is the story of thousands who had uprooted themselves and planted themselves in a foreign land. This is my favourite from this lot of movies and from the very first scene it has the uncanny and hypnotic ability to draw you in with the pastoral scenes and vivid characters. It is a story that is immediately familiar but yet through the storyteller’s lenses it becomes something you have never seen before. Not a single manufactured moment and every scene breathes with honesty. It is genuinely funny too. Watch out for a climatic scene which will break your heart into a million pieces and one moment a few minutes later mend it all up. I wouldn’t mind seeing this in the cinema again if it ever happens and I am sure this will get a number of Oscar nods.

Promising Young Woman (2020) is testament that a storyteller can tell the same story and it can still give the genre an adrenaline shot. This is a variation on the #MeToo theme but it hits it at an oblique angle. Love the camera angles used and the use of vivid colours. The use of music is a class act too. The ending may miss an emphatic one-two punch but it is an instantly memorable movie. Carey Mulligan is a shoo-in for a Best Actress nod and it’s going to come down to her and Frances McDormand.

Are there other good films I should see? Do let me know.

Review: Richard Jewell (2020). A David Versus Goliath Horror Story Based on Actual Events

Lately, I have been watching a lot of movies that share something in common – they are narratives that make me stare in disbelief at figure heads of authority and many a time I would hurl expletives at the scenes of gross miscarriage of justice and the failure of the legal system. Most recently it was Netflix’s When They See Us and prior before that it was the Sheep Without a Shepherd, a Chinese remake of Drishyam (2013), but what started it all was Clint Eastwood’s Richard Jewell. This is a David versus Goliath tragedy – a man was celebrated as a hero and a few days later he was vilified by the press and the FBI as a terrorist.

It was a sensational story in 1996: Richard Jewell, a security guard at the Olympic Games in Atlanta finds a bomb and saves hundreds of lives due to his quick thinking (and probably his set ways). A few days later, he turns from hero to villain being accused of masterminding the bombing. It couldn’t have happened to a nicer person.

I like how Eastwood paints Jewell – he is no paragon. He may worship the men in blue and sees himself as a police officer, but he oversteps his boundary in barging in on college kids “Mickey Mousing” around or even stopping cars on the roads for breaking traffic laws. He is a social misfit, a square peg to a round hole, always saying more than what is required especially if it is to people in the law enforcement. Jewell sees the world in black and white, following rules to a T as long as they have been written in the book. Owning a whole cache of legally purchased weapons doesn’t help his cause too. 

Paul Walter Hauser plays Richard Jewell and it’s a performance that feels genuinely lived-in. He is so good that I thought they actually cast a daft beatnik of an oddball in the role. Later, I would IMDb him and realised I have seen him most recently in I, Tonya and Blackkklansman. This is a role that finally puts him in the spotlight and the empathy emanating from his performance will leave an indelible mark on the most jaded movie-goer. In my humble opinion, he should have been rewarded with a nomination for Best Actor.

Hauser is supported by an able cast that includes Kathy Bates who plays Jewell’s loving mother and Sam Rockwell who plays his attorney, Watson Bryant. It’s the latter relationship that is engagingly portrayed. In fact, the movie begins with Jewell and Bryant in an office years before the heinous events. Bryant nicknamed Jewell “Radar” who was then an office guy, but he will become a steadfast believer of Jewell’s innocence. Rockwell can play these irascible but redeeming roles in his sleep. He is the voice of reason and the true north of the moral compass as Jewell becomes victimised and character-assassinated.

The twin Goliaths here are represented by Jon Hamm’s FBI agent and Olivia Wilde’s journalist Kathy Scruggs. Theirs is a blow by blow method on how to “kill” someone in the public eye. Unscrupulous and despicable, till the point I felt like stepping inside the screen to punch them. That usually means the storyteller got the mechanics right. Of the two, Wilde definitely drew the shorter stick with a thankless role, but kudos to her for a good performance that hit a nerve in the last act. While reading up on her character, I found out that both Jewell and Scruggs died very young. Till the last months of her life, the events that happened and her part in them still plagued her. The modern society can be very unforgiving and it is the same in any city.

Eastwood’s direction is not showy, editing feels invisible and nothing will take you away from the main story. He allows the scenes to breathe and none overstays their welcome. I hardly felt two hours pass and long after that the characters continue to stay in my mind. 

The later part of Eastwood’s career sees him train his erudite eye on lone heroes, deconstructing the idea of heroism and what it entails. Richard Jewell definitely fits like a glove into his oeuvre and it is as relevant today as it was in 1996. 

Written by Daniel Chiam

Review: Sky Castle (2018). Toxic Characters You Can Relate To

“Heard about the guy who fell off a skyscraper? On his way down past each floor, he kept saying to reassure himself: So far so good… so far so good… so far so good. How you fall doesn’t matter. It’s how you land!”

For some reason, watching the unbelievable shenanigans that transpired on screen made me think of the above quote from La Haine (1995) which resonated with me. This is a drama about housewives dressed to the nines in couture regalia with their hands in every pie, and when they are going down in flames, they are most worried about how they look.

Sky Castle follows the lives of 4 women living in the luxurious SKY Castle neighborhood. They try to make their husbands more successful and raise their children like princes and princesses; getting them into the top schools is their primary aim and they are willing to do anything to make sure it happens.

Han Seo-Jin (Yum Jung-Ah) is married to orthopedic surgeon Kang Joon-Sang (Jung Joon-Ho). They have two daughters. Han Seo-Jin seems to have a perfect life, but she has a secret.

Lee Soo-Im (Lee Tae-Ran) is a writer of children’s books. She holds a deep affection and consideration for people. Lee Soo-Im is married to neurosurgeon Hwang Chi-Young (Choi Won-Young). They have a son, Hwang Woo-Joo (Kang Chan-Hee).

No Seung-Hye (Yoon Se-Ah) is married to law school professor Cha Min-Hyuk (Kim Byung-Chul). Her husband talks about justice and happiness, but he hides a different side. One with having extreme egoism. They have two sons.

Jin Jin-Hee (Oh Na-Ra) comes from a wealthy family. Her father owns buildings. Jin Jin-Hee admires Han Seo-Jin and tries to copy what she does. Like Han Seo-Jin, Jin Jin-Hee is married to an orthopedic surgeon, Woo Yang-Woo (Jo Jae-Yun).

Han Seo Jin hires a coordinator Kim Joo Young (Kim Seo-Hyeong) to have her daughter Kang Ye Seo (Kim Hye-Yoon), a model student admitted to Seoul University Medical School. Following a tragic incident in the castle, the fates of the families are tangled and new revelations dawn.

IMDb’s synopsis asseverates Sky Castle as a satire, but I just couldn’t see this as a great one. For satire to work, it uses irony, humour and exaggeration to hold human nature up to criticism and scorn. A good satire pokes fun at the powers that be; sometimes creating a drive for social change. A successful satire has the uncanny ability to put you within the narrative; you laughed but you will realise you are laughing at yourself. Sky Castle wasn’t able to do that last bit. Yes, it does have gross exaggeration of human behaviour, ridiculous humour (only from episode 4 onwards) and some painful irony, but Sky Castle is almost vulgar in its portrayal of characters. It’s must-win-at-all-cause human behaviour dialled up to eleven with little art. However, it is prodigiously entertaining in the way it presents a menagerie of the most despicable behaviour of parents and the worst parenting techniques ever. The missus and my eyes were glued to the screen waiting to see how they would shoot themselves in the foot, and I got goosebumps watching the opening theme. The clever play with light and shadow on the actors’ faces showcases the best and worst of them.

Being in the education line, this Kdrama hits close to home. I see variations of this behaviour in parents who send their children to me, but thankfully most of these parents do not put impossible demands on their kids and me. They just want to give their children a step up in life. What is depicted on screen may be South Korea, but the pressure cooker atmosphere of education is also very real in my country.

The acting is fine wine here. All the women are delineated with each other and they are defined uniquely. Seo-Jin’s arc is well-drawn and you can feel her gradual realisation of what she has done to destroy her daughter’s life and also why she has to do what she did – lie. R.E.M. says Everybody Hurts, but I think it is even more correct to say everybody lies. You will not condone what she did, but you will understand why she did it.

I also like to watch Seung-Hye’s arc and she is the earliest one to realise she is wrong to stand by her husband who pushes their two sons to criminal levels. I love how Yoon Se-Ah plays her – always careful about what expression is written on her face and her rigid posture exudes a sense of guardedness. So when the heartbreak comes in one huge tidal wave, the facade falls down like bricks. Her interplay with her husband Cha Min-Hyuk reaches sublimity in the end as she finds her inner woman. It was a huge hurrah for womenfolk who had long hidden under their husbands’ long shadow. But my fave character is most definitely Professor Cha; Kim Byung-Chul plays him with such relish. The man gives Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs new meaning. For him, education is a battlefield and your job as a student is to not just be the best but to eviscerate all the competition. Seeing him get his comeuppance is one of the most satisfying feelings ever. There are many other outstanding actors here, and I should let you discover them on your own.

One of the missteps here is a sharp turn in the narrative from episode 16. While reading up, I realised due to the immense popularity of the drama the writer extended it by 4 episodes. It was essentially a whodunnit arc that I wouldn’t say is detrimental to the narrative, but I do feel that sharp turn that didn’t quite sit down well with the rest of the narrative. It felt like an odd change of pace.

Sky Castle has one huge plethora of toxic characters, but just because they are noxious doesn’t mean you can’t relate or love them. This is one of the cornerstones of great dramas and there is genius to be found here. Watching this is like having an intense argument with your loved ones; bridges are burned and no amount of time and effort can bring everything back to its original state. You will be immersed in the lives of these toxic individuals who are brought together by the need to succeed at all cause and you can’t help but put your own real-world problems into perspective. You may dislike them, but you can’t help but understand them. If the intense family soap opera could be framed, this would go very well on the walls of The Louvre.

I like what Woo-Joo said to his parents after going through the worst grinder ever and he realises education isn’t everything, it doesn’t define him. These following words spoken by him resonate with me…

“Power… doesn’t come from where I graduate from. Who I am, what kind of person I am and what I live for. When all that is clear, isn’t that where power comes from?”

Written by Daniel Chiam

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started